Origin of existence according to Big Bang

To pehla sawal to ye tha ke how it came into existence? Ya is ka wajood kaise hua? To wajood ko unhone Big Bang theory jo hai, us se explain kiya. Jo ke 20th century ke first quarter mein, ghaleban 1931 mein pesh ki gayi thi. To Wo par bohat kuch research hui. Kafi research ke baad ab Big Bang theory jo hai, scientific community ne is ko maan liya hai.

And now it is scientifically an established theory. Lekin phir jo doosra sawal aa gaya ke jab sare electron jo hain, jo release hue, To phir wo kaise dobara wo combine hue? Kyun ke is ke liye mass darkar hai. To is ke liye ab, ab jo unhone mana hai ke, ke Higgs Boson, to agar is ko maan liya jaye scientific mind ke mutabiq, to Higgs Boson is baat ko explain karta hai ke kis tarah dobara sare particle exist hue aur phir wo cheezein tamam bani. Ye hai theory. Yani khulasa jo hai, saada zaban mein. Is ko ek dekhein, ek to technical zaban hoti hai.

Technical zaban jo hai, wo ek alag hi zaban hai. Main aap ko is ka jo saada taur par jo baat hai, wo arz kar raha hoon. Is mein mujhe ek baat aur bhi acknowledge karna hai ke is maamle mein mujh ko bohat zyada help mili hai. Meri jo granddaughter hai, wo Maria. Maria, yani Physics Honors mein unhone first first division se pass kiya hai imtehan Physics Honors mein. aur bohat hi zyada parhne wali larki hai. Maria jo meri grand daughter hai, us ne bohat zyada help ki.

yani main aap jante hain ke main internet istemal nahi kar sakta. to sara nikal nikal kar mujhe bataya, parh kar sunaya, discuss kiya. To bohat zyada main wo us ko acknowledge karta hoon. Allah taala us ko, hum, hum is mein us ki, uska ajar de, us ke reward de. to is tareeqe se main yeh baat jo keh raha hoon, yani us ko main, yani ek, ek bohat dil lage hain mujh ko us ko, us yahan tak pohnchne mein.

is mein, ah, meri daughter grand daughter Maria ki help kafi meri madadgar sabit hui. To yeh hai hooks bozan ka ek saada tasawwur. lekin mujhe jo dilchaspi hai, jo main aap se arz karna chahta hoon, wo wo ek aur baat hai. Wo hai Quran se is ka talluq. dekhen, Quran mein bohat hi ajeeb baat hai ke Quran mein ek ayat hai Surah Nisa, yani chapter four, verse number 82 mein: "Afla tadabbar al Quran wa lau kana min inda ghair Allah la wajadu fihi ikhtilafan kathira".

sach poochhen to mujhe Quran wala jo aspect hai, usi se dilchaspi hai mujhe. Usi ke liye maine yeh tamheed bayan ki aap ko. To yeh jo ayat hai Surah Nisa mein, is ka matlab yeh hai ke kya yeh log Quran par ghaur nahi karte? Quran par ghaur nahi karte, tadabbur nahi karte? agar Quran Allah ke siwa kisi aur ki taraf se hota to wo is ke andar bohat zyada ikhtilaf paate. yeh ikhtilaf ka lafz hai, bohat hi important hai. Mufassireen ikhtilaf ko samajhne mein zyada kamyab nahi hue hain. Lekin yeh maine is pe bohat ghaur kiya.

to yeh bhi meri ek discovery hai Allah ke fazl se. ikhtilaf ke ma'ne yahan par jo aam taur par jo lafz bola jata hai, is tarah wo ma'ne nahi hain. Yahan par ma'ne hain inconsistency ya adam mutabiqat. yeh matlab hai is ka. Yani ikhtilaf kis ke beech mein? Quran ki ayaton ke beech mein nahi. Quran aur kharji haqiqaton ke beech mein ikhtilaf.

yani ek hai Quran ka statement aur ek hai world of facts jo Quran se bahar hai. To world of facts mein aur Quran ke statement mein koi ikhtilaf nahi hoga. yani inconsistency nahi hogi. Adam mutabiqat nahi hogi. Yeh bohat ajeeb statement tha. Kyun ke aap jante hain ke Quran seven century ke first quarter mein utra. us waqt kuch bhi nahi tha duniya mein. Na science thi, na telescope thi, na microscope thi, na us waqt tick computer tha, na us waqt aaj kal ke jo tareeqe hain research karne ke, wo sab kuch the. wo traditional daur tha. Log suppressed mein jeete the. Kisi cheez ko jo insan janta nahi tha. Us waqt yeh ayat utri.

is ayat ko agar is se jodiye aap ke Quran ek abadi kitab hai. Yeh waqti kitab nahi hai. to is ko jod kar sochiye to ek abadi challenge tha yeh. Eternal challenge. Yani Quran rahega qayamat tak ke liye. to is ka matlab yeh hua ke qayamat tak jo baatein insan daryaft karega, universe of fact jo abhi hidden hai, us ko jab daryaft karega to jo statement Quran mein hai, us se us ki is mein mutabiqat rahegi . Adam, adam mutabiqat nahi hogi. Inconsistency hogi. Yeh kitni ajeeb baat hai. Yeh seven century ke first quarter mein Quran yeh kehta hai ke baad ko jab saensy daur aayega, discovery ka daur aayega,

aur university of fact ko log daryaft karein ge, is waqt quran ke statement mein aur jo jo discovery hogi, us mein koi cons, koi inconsistency nahi hogi. koi adam mutabi qat nahi hogi. yeh koi ek challenge tha, challenge. to aap ghor kijiye ke bohat ajeeb o ghareeb tor par baatein sabit ho rahi hain. misal ke taur par dekhiye, is se pehle ek baat ka aur hawala dena chahta hoon, phir is par aaunga ke quran mein Hazrat Musa ka jo jo contemporary king tha, jis ko firoun kaha jata hai,

to quran ke mutabiq aur bible ke mutabiq woh samandar mein gharaq ho gaya. is waqt quran ke mutabiq Allah ne farmaya tha ke "alyawm nurjeeka bibadnika litakuna liman khalfak". aaj hum tumhare body ko bacha kar rakhein ge. aaj hum tumhare body ko bacha kar rakhein ge taake baad walon ke liye nishani ho. ab yeh ghor kijiye ke yeh waqea hai saare teen hazar saal pehle ka. saare teen hazar saal pehle to kuch hi pata nahi tha. jab

quran mein ayat utri to us waqt kuch bhi nahi pata tha insaan ko ke firoun ka body kahan hai. kaisi ajeeb baat hai. "alyawm nurjeeka bibadnika litakuna liman khalfak". is waqt Allah ne farmaya saare teen hazar saal pehle ke firoun ka jo body hai marne ke baad, woh rakha jaye ga, mehfooz rahe ga, mehfooz rahe ga. ab baad wale is ko discover kar ke us se sabak lein ge. to jab quran utra to kuch bhi involve nahi tha is ke baray mein.

one percent bhi kuch involve nahi tha. baad ko kya hua ke dunya mein ilm aaya, dunya mein taraqqiyan huin, dunya mein research ka daur aaya. to nineteen century ke yani aakhir mein kuch France ke aur Germany ke kuch scholar gaye Misr. wahan jo jis ko kehte hain pyramid yani ahram, us mein unhon ne is ka gate khola jo band pada hua tha. koi, koi kholta nahi tha is ko. kyunke mashhoor tha ke is ke andar laanat al-firaunah hai. firounon ki laanat.

to laanat al-firaunah ki wajah se is ko kholte nahi the woh. unhon ne khola aur khol kar ke is ke andar se body nikala. is mein firoun ki body mumyai kar ke yani mummification jo kehte hain, kar ke rakhi hui thi. aap jante hain ke mummification ke baad body hazaron saal tak waisi ki waisi reh sakti hai. koi khaas technique hai jo Misriyon mein bohat taraqqi yafta thi us zamane mein. is ko nikala, nikal kar bahar laye. aur aap jante hain ke us zamane mein ek bohat ajeeb cheez daryaft hui hai jis ko kehte hain carbon fourteen dating.

yani pichli cheezein jo hain un ki tareekh ko maloom karna. to woh jo ek technique hai, us technique ko unhon ne apply kiya. apply kiya to bohat ajeeb baat maloom hui ke yeh firoun Hazrat Musa ka contemporary firoun hai. yeh body jo hai Hazrat Musa ke contemporary firoun ki body hai. to kaha jo baat quran mein kahi gayi thi seven century ke first quarter mein, woh unniswin sadi ke aakhir mein daryaft ho gayi. is tarah se confirm hua ke quran ke statement mein aur bahar ki haqiqaton mein ikhtilaf nahi hai. yani inconsistency nahi hai.

kaisi ajeeb baat yeh hai. isi tarah ki ek misal yeh hai jis par hum is waqt baat kar rahe hain. to quran mein dekhiye surah al anbiya jo chapter number 21 hai, is ki aik woh ayat hai jo yeh hai ke "inna al samawati wal arda kanata rataqan fataqnahuma wa ja'alna min al ma'i kulla shai'in hayyin". yeh hai chapter 21 verse 30 yani al anbiya ki teesri ayat. to is ka is ka matlab kya hai? is ka tarjuma yeh hai ke "the heavens and the earth were

joint together, then we split them asunder". yani zameen aur aasman aapas mein jure hue thay, phir hum ne is ko alag kar diya. aur phir hum ne pani bana se har cheez banai, zinda cheez. is mein dekhen do lafz istemal hua hai: rataq aur fataq. yani zameen o aasman is se pehle fataq rataq ki halat mein thay. rataq kehte hain arabi mein kehte hain munzamir ajza, jaise yeh hai. yeh munzamir ajza aik doosre mein juda hua.

munzamir ajza yani joint together. to kaisi ajeeb baat hai ke quran yeh keh raha hai ke ibtida mein poora zameen o aasman ka jo mass hai, jo madah hai, poora ka poora aik aik hi wahid cheez mein aise juda hua tha. rataq ki halat mein tha, yani integrated form mein tha. p

har kya hua? fataq hua. fataq ka matlab kehte hain kholna, disintegrate karna. yeh bohat hi ajeeb hui baat hai ke pehle rataq tha, phir fataq hua. yani pehle sari universe integrated form mein thi, phir is mein disintegration hua. to yeh aeen wohi cheez hai jis ko baad ko scientist science ne daryaft kiya big bang ki shakal mein . big bang ki theory yahi hai ke pehle poori kainat aik bohat bade cosmic ball ki surat mein thi. bohat yani sare particle jo universe mein aaj hain, woh sab ke sab jure hue thay. is ko kaha jata hai cosmic ball.

to is mein aik fusion hua. is tarah hua, tab ja kar ke aisa hua ke sare particle bikhargaye. yehi to hua. rataq tha, phir fataq hua. aeen wohi cheez hai. rataq tha, phir fataq hua. is ke baad farmaya ke "wa ja'alna min al ma'i kulla shai'in hayyin" aur hum ne banaya pani se tamam zindagi zinda cheezen. is mein dekhiye, pani ki aik alamat misal de kar cheezen kaise form hui, woh bataya gaya hai ke woh woh jo disintegration, disintegration hua tha, tamam particle ka, to phir is ko Allah taala ne phir jora.

isi mein se aik misal hai pani ki, jis mein aap jante hain ke do element hotay hain, yani oxygen aur hydrogen. hydrogen aur oxygen ke jo do atom ke milne se wahan par aik molecule banta hai. phir molecule se wo hota hai, yani aik bohat bada, is ka bohat hi yani complex tareeqa hai. to bahar hal, hydrogen, hydrogen, oxygen ke jo jo particle thay, woh sab to fiza bikhre hue thay.

jab woh aapas mein jarengay, tab to atom atom banega. to bikhre hue particle jure aur phir molecule bana aur phir atom bana is ka, yani oxygen ka aur hydrogen ka, phir molecule bana. to ain wahi cheez yeh hai jis ko aaj is science ne ka yeh jo daawa hai ke daryaft kiya hum ne is is particle ko jis ne mass diya. kyun ke mass agar na hota to aik doosre ke liye attraction nahi hota. kyun ke madi cheezein aik doosre ko kheenchti hain. is mein yaani attraction hota hai.

to kaisi ajeeb baat hai ke jo statement quran mein tha, ain usi ke mutabiq aaj discovery hui hai. farq sirf kya hai? farq yeh hai ke jo theist bind hai, jo khuda ko banne baghair chahte hain, yaani kainat ko explain karna, woh samajhte hain ke isi yaani Higgs Boson se wajood mein aayi kainat. lekin sawal yeh hai, Higgs Boson jo hai, us ko kis ne, kis ne us ko paida kiya? yaani woh apne aap kaise paida ho gaya? woh to sawal phir bhi baqi hai, phir bhi baqi hai sawal.

is aik baat mein yaad dilaun jo mein ne apni kitaab mein likhi hai "God Arises" mein ke jab Newton ke zamanay mein jab woh daryaft hua ke duniya mein principle of causation hai, yaani cause and effect ka usool hai, aik cause hota hai, phir us ka effect hota hai. tamam cheezein jo duniya mein hain, woh sab principle of causation se chal rahi hain, control ho rahi hain. to us waqt yeh kaha gaya hai ke ab khuda ki zaroorat nahi hai, ab khuda ki zaroorat nahi. hum ne maloom kar liya ke cheezein kaise bani ti hain. to us waqt kaha gaya tha ke jab apni daryaft kar liya, law of nature jo hai, woh cheezon ko shape deta hai, to ab khuda ki kya zaroorat hai?

khuda ki koi zaroorat nahi hai. yaani Newton ke baad jo daryaften huien, us se maloom hua ke jis ko hum nature kehte hain, fitrat, saari cheezein, yaani science ki zubaan mein jo kuch bhi hai, woh sab nature hai. chahe insaan ho, chahe ghaas ho, chahe sitare hon, sayare hon, sab nature hain. to agar yeh nature jo hai, cause and effect ke usool ke tehat bani hai, to phir khuda ki kya zaroorat hai? koi cause and effect ko samjha ke hi khuda, yaani ab khuda ke manne ki zaroorat nahi hai.

halan ke yeh yeh galat fehmi thi. kyun ke sawal ab bhi baqi tha ke khud nature ko, khud nature ke course ko, khud law of causation ko kis ne wajood diya? woh kaise wajood aaya? yeh cheez sawal phir hi baqi tha. to unhon ne yeh kaha tha ke "if events are due to natural causes, they're not due to supernatural causes. if events are due to natural causes, they're not due to supernatural causes." to mein ne likha tha apni kitaab mein ke "nature does not explain, she is she itself is in need of explanation." nature explain nahi karti, balkay dobara is sawal hai ke nature ko kis ne takhleeq kiya?

dobara yeh sawal hai. wahi haal wahan aik muamla yahan hai ke Higgs Boson explain nahi karta, yaani full stop nahi lag jata yahan par. ab sawal yeh hai ke khud Higgs Boson ko kis ne takhleeq kiya? yaani aisa ajeeb o ghareeb particle jo agarchay unstable hai, aisa ajeeb o ghareeb particle ke woh tamam particle ko mass de deta hai. yeh kaisi ajeeb baat hai? jo particle mein mass nahi tha, yeh us ko mass deta hai aur phir saari kainat wajood mein aati hai. chahe pani ho, chahe mountain ho, chahe insaan ho, chahe darakht ho, sab wajood mein aate hain.

to woh, woh, woh jo miraculous particle, woh khud kaise wajood mein aa gaya? to sawal to phir hi baqi hai. to jab tak aap yeh na manen ke aik khuda hai jis ne big bang mein explosion kiya, aik khuda hai jis ne cosmic ball ko banaya, aik khuda hai jis ne particles ko mass diya, to phir bhi sawal baqi rahe ga. sawal wahin ka wahin baqi rahe ga. kyun ke aap jo jo cheez, jo cheez aap ne daryaft ki hai, woh wahan, wahan, wahan full stop nahi lag jata ۔ is ke baad yeh sawal baqi rehta hai. to mein yeh kahunga ke yeh yaani hamein apne mutale ko abhi aage le chalna hai.

mushkil yeh hai ke is mamle mein jo jo kaam jo log kar rahe hain, woh woh hain jo Khuda ko hadaf kar ke kaam kar rahe hain. research jo kar rahe hain, jo log aur jo Khuda ko manane wale log hain, un ka is mein koi hissa nahin. woh to apne ibadat khano mein ya apne madarson mein masroof hain. unhein pata bhi nahin ke kya nature hai, kya nature ke qawaneen hain. to yaani yahan mein yeh kehna chahunga ke Quran ki ek aur ayat yaad dilana chahta hoon mein ke Quran mein ek ayat hai ke "sanureehim ayatina filafaq fi anfusihim hatta atbain alhaqq" ke hum dikhayen ke logon ko apni nishaniyan

kainat mein aur insano ke andar, yahan tak ke wazeh ho jaye ke haqq hai. yehi to nishaniyan hain, yehi to nishaniyan hain. to jo jo ehle iman the, jo Allah ko manane wale the, unhone in nishaniyon ko discover nahin kiya. unhone is mamle mein koi kaam nahin kiya. woh doosre se kaam masroof ho gaye. to Allah taala ne ek scientific community wajood mein layi. Allah taala scientific community, jo ke Bukhari mein ek riwayat hai ke "innallaha yuzirr al-fajir" ke Allah fajir insan ke zariye bhi madad karega.

is deen ki fajir se murad yahan par secular hai. fajir se murad ma'roof fajir nahin hai. to bas batao ke scientific community is se murad hai. yeh scientific community woh cheezen daryaft karegi jis se tamam haqq haqiqaten hain, jo jo Quran mein bator nadri ke batai gayi hain, woh bator waqe ke logon ke samne aa jayengi. to yeh mein samajhta hoon ke yaani agarche ehle iman khud is qism ki discovery nahin kar sake, lekin ab unhein chahiye karna hai ke is ko istemal karen, is ko bator data ke. yeh unhone facts ko daryaft kar ke hamein de diya, unhone data daryaft kar ke hamein de diya. is tarah hamein ek scientific framework de diya hai, is ko hamein istemal karna chahiye aur istemal kar ke hamein yaani apne iman mein izafa karna chahiye aur is ko dawat ke liye istemal karna chahiye.

yeh hai. to mera jo is waqt jo kehna hai God Particle ke bare mein to mein is waqt koi koi scientific taqreer nahin kar raha hoon. yeh keh raha hoon ke God Particle ki jo daryaft hai, woh daryaft bohat ajeeb o ghareeb tor par Quran ke is miyar par Quran ki sadaqat ko sabit kar rahi hai ke ke Quran ke nuzool ke baad jo daryaften hongi, jo discoveries hongi, woh Quran ke bayan ko confirm karti chali jayengi kyunke un mein aur un mein takrao nahin hoga, adam mutabiqat nahin hogi, inconsistency nahin hogi. to yeh kaisi ajeeb baat hai? yeh bohat zyada ajeeb baat hai. yeh to mujhe is waqt jo hai isi pehlu par yaani isi pehlu, isi pehlu ko highlight karna hai.

yeh yeh jo pehlu hai ke Quran ki sadaqat se is se sabit hoti hai. yeh yeh jo logon ka kuch log yeh nikalte hain is se ke science ne Khuda ko sabit kar diya, yeh galat baat hai. science, science ka subject Khuda nahin hai. science ka subject Khuda nahin hai. science subject jo hai, woh cheezen jo hamare observation mein aati hain, jin ka hum explain kar sakte hain, jo jo hamare microscope aur hawai telescope se jin ko hum pata kar sakte hain, woh is ka subject hai. Khuda is subject mein hai hi nahin. lekin chunke yeh cheezen kya, yeh sab creation hai, Khuda ki takhleeq hai. to is ke bare mein jab daryaften hoti hain to woh khaliq ki tasdeeq ke hum ma'ni ban jati hain.

khaliq ki tasdeeq ke hum ma'ni. yahan mein ek baat yeh bhi arz karna chahunga ke kuch log yeh samajhte hain ke scientists mulhid hote hain, Islam woh haqq ke dushman hote hain waghera hai. aisa nahin hai ke mislan ek sahab ne kaha ke jab yeh sab science, science yahan tak pahunch chuki hai to scientists Khuda ko manta kyun nahin? yeh wahan tak pahunch gayi to scientists Khuda ko manta kyun nahin? yeh baat sahi nahin hai mere nazdeek. kyunke aap dekhiye, science ka jo mozu hai, woh speech, woh na spiritual hai na religious hai. woh na yeh hai na woh hai. woh to, woh, woh to sirf hai jo yaani kainat ka jo contritive aspect hai, is ka mutala karna.

kamyabi aspect jo hai kainat ka ya material, material world ka jo contritive, contritive aspect hai, is ka mutala karna, is ka mozu hai. woh is ke mozu se kharij hai. jise hum aap farz kijiye quran ka mutala karein to hum us waqt hawae doosri kitabein hamare bojh se kharij rahein gi. to scientist ko main samajhta hoon ke is par yeh yani blame nahi dena chahiye ke woh yeh sari daryaften karne ke baad bhi khuda ko mante kyun nahi. basic baat woh, woh un ki jo conditioning hai, un ka jo mind hai, woh nahi jo hamara hai.

hum aap mazhabi istalah mein sochte hain, hum aap yani khuda ko man kar chalte hain, wahan yeh masla nahi hai. wahan to masla yeh hai ke kainat ka jo woh, woh, woh pehlu jo observation, observation mein aata hai, jis ko hum tajurba kar sakte hain, is ke mutala ko unhone apna mozu banaya hai. bas hamein jo, jo hamein, hamara jo, hamare liye jo itminan bakhsh cheez hai, yeh hai ke khuda ko mozu banaye baghair unhone kainat ki tehqeeq ki aur bohat ajeeb tor par woh jitni bhi cheezein daryaft huien, woh sab quran ki tasdeeq ban gaein. kisi ajeeb baat hai

! un ka concern na khuda tha na quran tha. yeh un ka yeh concern hi nahi tha. woh adalat, adalat, adalatana tor par unhone tehqeeq ki. adalatana tor par un ka, jaise maine jo misal di ke yani farooq ki jo mummy ki hui lash jo nikali unhone, un ka, un ka concern quran ya khuda nahi tha. woh to aik historical zouq ke tehat, kyun ke yani woh scholar thay, secular scholar, woh apne zouq ke tehat woh har cheez ki tehqeeq kar rahe thay. koi fir'auni ki tarah ke tehqeeq hi nahi hai, har cheez ki tehqeeq kar rahe thay. isi mein se woh bhi aik item ban gaya, wahan hi pahunch gaye. woh

to un ka yani un ka yeh subject nahi tha ke is se quran ki tasdeeq nikalen. nahi, un ka subject sirf yeh tha ke aaram mein kya hai, is ko nikalein, janein, is ko tehqeeq karein. bas ab yeh is ka by product hai ke hum is ko le kar ke is ko quran ke haq mein istemal karein. yeh hamara kaam hai. is tarah se god particle ka mamla bhi hai ke un ka yeh mozu god nahi hai. yeh to aik nickname hai ke is ko god kaha jane laga, warna is ka asal naam to jaise ke maine arz kiya yani hicks bozan hai. to un ko is se matlab nahi ke khuda hai ya nahi hai. is se woh na yeh kehte hain ke khuda nahi hai, na yeh kehte hain ke khuda hai.

jaise einstein se poocha gaya tha ke kya aap atheist hain? einstein se aik shakhs ne poocha tha, yeh chupa hua hai is ki life mein ke us ne correspondence ki thi einstein se. phir kaha aap khuda ke munkir hain? kya aap atheist hain? kya khuda ka inkar karte hain aap? to us ne likha tha is mein ke aap mujh ko atheist nahi kar sakt e. main atheist nahi hoon. aap mujhe sirf agnostic samajh sakte hain. atheist nahi balkeh agnostic. yani agnostic ka matlab hota hai na, na yeh main kehta hoon ke khuda hai, na yeh kehta hoon ke khuda nahi hai. mera koi statement is baray mein nahi hai, nafiya hai na isbata.

to yeh, yeh, yeh manna galat hai scientists ke baray mein. yeh bohat sahi statement diya einstein ne mere nazdeek ke hamara case yani isi ka nahi balkeh har scientist ka case, atheist ka case nahi hai. is ka case yahi hai ke woh is baray mein koi statement nahi dete. woh statement dete hain sirf is cheezon ke baray mein jo observation mein aati hai. yeh to secular log hain jo atheist hain. unhone science ke nazriat ko hijack kar liya. hijack kar ke apni batein is se nikalte hain.

khud scientist ne aisa kuch nahi kiya. science, koi bhi science dan hain, jitne scientist hain mere ilm ke mutabiq, un mein se koi bhi munkir khuda nahi. koi bhi yeh nahi kehta ke khuda nahi hai. koi bhi yeh nahi kehta ke main atheist hoon. yeh koi bhi nahi kehta. sab ka case wahi hai jo Einstein ka case hai ke woh apne ko agnostic samajhte hain. na yeh daawa karte hain ke khuda hai, na yeh daawa karte hain ke khuda nahi hai. toh hamara apna kaam hai ke unhon ne universe of fact ke baray mein jo baatein daryaft ki hain, hum us ka mutalia karein. mutalia kar ke is ko hum apne haq mein istemal karein.

aur yahan mein aik baat yaad karna chahunga ke kuch asbab se hamare ulma mein aik negative thinking aa gayi science ke baray mein. woh samajhte hain ke science jo hai, koi anti-God ilm ka naam hai, mazhab ka hai ke khilaf. toh yeh, yeh aik ajeeb baat is tarah hui ke jis zamane mein science ka zahoor hua, usi zamane mein istemar ka bhi zahoor hua. yani colonialism, istemar aik saath dono ka zahoor hua. yani maghribi mein baray baray scientist hi paida hue, ab maghribi mein istemar hi paida hua.

aur istemar ne musalmanon ka jo political empire tha, us ko tod diya. Mughal empire, Spanish empire, Ottoman empire sab tod diya. toh consciously ya unconsciously musalman ulma yeh samajh bethe ke yeh sab Islam dushman hain. sab ko Islam dushman samajh liya unhon ne. yani sara West Islam dushman hai aur modern civilization Islam dushman hai, modern science Islam dushman hai. yeh sab hua bilkul bekhabri mein.

aik arabi ka aik maqoola hai ke "al-nas adaa ma jahiloo". "al-nas adaa ma jahiloo" ka matlab hai ke log us baat ke dushman ban jate hain jis ko woh na jante hon. toh na janne ki wajah se West se nafrat, maghribi tehzeeb se nafrat, hatta ke science se bhi nafrat na janne ki wajah se yeh bohat ziyada nadani ki baatein hain. aur yeh sab bila baghair mutaliq. aise logon se jab mein baat karta hoon ke kya parha hai aap ne toh unhon ne kuch bhi nahi parha. woh baghair parhe hue nafrat karte karte hain, baghair parhe hue. toh yaad rakhiye, har aik ko us ke maqam par rakh kar dekhiye.

aap scientist ko ya kisi ko jab jaanchen toh pehle yeh samjhein ke is ka, is ka apna moqaf kya hai, is ka apna stand kya hai. toh woh yeh kehte hi nahi ke hum khuda ko dhoondh rahe hain. is ka yeh daawa nahi hai. toh is is par aap koi judge karein, us ko us par judge karne ki zaroorat hi nahi hai. jo jo is ka daawa hai, us ke lehaz se us ko dekhiye. toh mujhe Allah Akbar se kisi se nafrat nahi, na West se, na Western civilization se, na kisi kisi se bhi.

yeh Allah taala ne mera dil aisa banaya ke mere dil mein kisi ki nafrat aati nahi. is liye mein bilkul objective tor par cheezon ko parhta hoon, objective tor par. toh mujhe bohat faida hota hai. aur haqeeqat yeh hai ke mein yeh kaha karta hoon ke science jo hai, poori ki poori jadeed ilm-e-kalam hai. science jo hai, poori ki poori jadeed ilm-e-kalam hai. yani ilm-e-kalam ka matlab hota hai theology. yani theology ka matlab hota hai mazhab ko rational way mein pesh karna. mazhab ko rational way mein pesh karne ka naam hota hai theology. toh poori ki poori science jo hai, theology hai. kyunke hum ko woh data deti hai, hum ko facts deti hai, hum ko maloomat deti hai jis ko le kar ke hum mazhab ko ziyada fortify kar sakein, ziyada us ko samajh sakein aur dawat mein us ko istemal kar sakein.

toh yeh yeh sab baatein bohat ziyada janne ki hain. humein chahiye ke hum confusion mein na jayen. confusion mein us waqt jeeta hai aadmi jab ke cheezon ko sort out na kar sake. jab aap cheezon ko sort out na kar sakein to aap confusion mein jeete hain. aur agar aap sort out kar lein to confusion khatam ho jata hai. main ne aksar yahi dekha hai ke log cheezon ko sort out nahi kar paate. ek cheez ko doosri cheez se alag nahi kar paate.

to ajeeb ajeeb baatein karte hain, ajeeb ajeeb confusion mein padte hain. jaise main ne bataya ke aap ko aaj hi ke urdu akhbar mein chupa hai ke "zarre zarre mein Khuda hai". yeh confusion ki baat hai, yeh bekhabri ki baat hai. jo cheez daryaft hui hai, us ka talluq is se harghiz nahi hai ke zarre zarre mein Khuda hai. yeh hum ne khud se nikaal liya. to bohat ziyada zaroori hai ke ghair badastana andaaz mein cheezon ko parha jaye, khaalis objective tor par cheezon ko parha jaye.

agar aap objectivity mein kami hogi to ab baat ko samajhne mein bhi kami ho jayegi. jitna ziyada aap objective honge, woh utna hi baaton ko samajh payenge. utna ziyada yaani is zamane mein kaha jata hai ke "knowledge explosion" ka zamana hai. "knowledge explosion" yaani maloomati infijar. to yeh saara jo maloomati infijar jo hai, woh sab yaani dawat-e-haq ke himayat karta hai, sab ka sab. kyun ke maloomati infijar kya hai?

jo chupi hui haqiqatein theen fitrat mein, nature mein, unhi ko daryaft kiya hai logon ne. to woh kya hai? woh to Allah taala ka qanoon hai, Allah taala ki takhleeq hai. lekin maloomati infijar jo hai, is se bekhabri ki bina par hum kal mujh se ek sahib ne bataya ke yahan ek bahar se koi Maulana sahib aaye thay Dilli mein, un ki taqreer hui . bare dhoom se taqreer mein unhon ne kaha ke "dekhiye, is liye do Islam ke sirf do dushman hain. do dushman sirf hain Islam ke. woh kaun hain? Yahoodi aur Isai." yeh bilkul baseless baat hai, koi dushman nahi.

isi zehan ki wajah se cheezon ko hum positive mein le nahi paate. kyun ke hum dushman samajhte hain. bohat bade bade kaam kiye hain Yahoodi ulma ne, bohat bade bade bade kaam kiye hain Isai ulma ne, bohat bade bade kaam. is ka ek pehlu dekhein yeh hai ke jo baatein Quran mein aayi hain, woh baatein bohat si aisi jo jo historical baatein hain, woh is mein bhi aayi hain, Bible mein aayi hain. Bible jis ko ke Yahoodi mante hain aur Isai mante hain, to is ki wajah se woh is ki tehqeeq karte hain. Musalman to tehqeeq hi nahi kar sake.

misalan yeh jo Firon ki body wali baat hai, agarche ek Muslim mulk bhi thi woh, lekin Muslim tehqeeq hi nahi kar sakte thay. Aram mein wahan gaya hoon, Cairo ke bahar desert hai, wahan par sab Aram hai. wahan par to ek Muslim mulk hai woh. to Firon ka body jis ka zikr hai Quran mein ke woh woh daryaft hoga, woh woh body Muslim mulk mein hai, lekin Muslim mulk is ko kuch bhi nahi jante is bare mein. kyun? is ki yeh hai, is ki wajah yeh hai ke jo Aram hain, is mein bade bade gate lage hue hain. to kabhi aisa hua ke is ke andar khol kar kisi ne kuch jhaanka hoga to us ko behosh ho gaya. woh to yeh wahan mashhoor ho gaya ke Aram mein laanat-ul-Firauna hai,

Firon ki laanat hai. to band hi parha raha woh, muddaton se band parha raha. to yeh yeh Christian ulma jinhon ne Bible mein Firon ko parha tha, Musalman nahi, woh ja kar ke idhar udhar dhoond dhoond rahe hain. woh wahan unhon ne khola to wahan bhi jab jab unhon ne khola to bohat zabardast qism ka andar se bhubka aaya aur jaldi se unhon ne gate band kar diya. lekin is par research ki unhon ne to maloom yeh hua ke jo andar se jo bohat tez qism ki woh gas type ki cheez aayi thi, woh lanat al-frainah nahi thi.

woh woh thi wahan us ke andar woh hain jisko hum kehte hain ababeel, woh chiriyaan bohat zyada hain, beshumar chiriyaan hain. is mein woh bait karti rehti hain, un ki bait ki wajah se us ke andar gas bhar gayi hai. Yani yani aaram ke andar gas bhar gayi hai. to jab insaan koi gate kholega to woh woh gas ko inhale inhale karega, inhale karte hi behosh ho jayega.

woh to unhon ne kya kiya? unhon ne is ko discover kiya ke is ke andar is ki bait ki gases hain aur is ko inhale karne ki wajah se aisa hota hai. to unhon ne kya kiya ke machine ke zariye se woh nikala, gases nik ali. aap jante hain aaj kal ke jaise exhaust fan hota hai andar ki hawa nikalne ke liye, aise bari bari machinein lagai gayeen, bari bari machinein. aur aaram ke andar jo gases theen, woh sab nikala gaya. Nikalne ke baad andar jab woh bilkul purified ho gaya to yeh log andar gaye.

andar ja kar wahan dekha unhon ne ke is ko lashain padi hui hain, momyai ki hui. is ko nikal kar le gaye aur tehqeeq kiya aur phir carbon 14 dating ko apply kar diya. Yeh sara kaam unhon ne kiya kyunke Bible mein parha tha unhon ne. to agarche musalmanon ko janna chahiye tha yeh baat kyunke Quran mein zikr tha is ka ke musalmanon ne kuch bhi nahi kiya, khud muslim mulk mein hai, tab bhi nahi kiya. to aap use nafrat kyun karte hain?

to yeh ek ek bare aalim ne aa kar taqreer kar rahi hai yahan par ke Islam ke sirf do dushman hain, isai aur yahoodi. unhon ne to sare bare bare kaam kiye hain. Aaj kalji misaal ke taur par dekhiye, Hazrat Ibrahim alaihissalam ke bare mein morkheen yeh keh rahe the ke un ka wajood nahi koi. yeh bohat ajeeb baat hai, Hazrat Ibrahim alaihissalam ka wajood nahi historically. Lekin inhi logon ne kya kiya ke Baghdad ke paas ek shehar daryaft kiya, khodai kiya, us ki khodai kar ke zameen ke andar se nikala ek poora shehar jiska naam Ur rakha gaya hai, UR Ur.

to unhon ne kaha Hazrat Ibrahim ko tareekhi hasiyat de di jisko morkheen samajhte the woh afsanvi hasiyat diye hue the. Tareekhi hasiyat de di jis shehar mein Hazrat Ibrahim paida hue, jahan unhon ne kaam kiya, yani Ur, woh poora ka poora shehar unhon ne khodai kar ke nikal diya. to kitne bare bare qabil log kar rahe hain, yahi yahoodi ulma, yahi isai ulma. To aap se nafrat kyun karte hain? Un ko dushman kyun kehte hain? Woh to hamare dost hain. to behal main yeh arz karunga ke sab se zaroori cheez hai positive thinking. Negative thinking bohat hi zyada buri hai aur aur sari achaiyan jo hain woh positive thinking mein Allah taala ne rakh diya. meri dua hai ke hum aap sahih zehn ke sath cheezon ko samjhein aur is se jo sabak hai woh lein.

aqool qawli hadha wastaghfirullaha li walakum ajmaeen . Maulana, yeh sawal aaya hai Miss Saira Latif ka Karachi Pakistan se. Unhon ne likha hai: "Roohani taraqqi aur zehni irtiqaa ki raah mein sab se bari rukawat kya hai?