Ideal role of Muslim da'i in modern times

koi aawaaz aasman se aawaaz nahi aayegi. agla sawal Jammu o Kashmir se Abdul Qayyum Nadvi sahib ka hai. unhone likha hai: "what is an ideal role of a muslim as a da'i in the modern context of things when other ideologies are being more forcefully propagated?" main to nahi maanta ke more forcefully woh propagate kar rahe hain. jitna main padhta hoon, yaqeen kijiye ke without any exception hai ke confusion hota hai, kahin clarity nahi hoti. agar aap ke nazdeek koi hai, kisi ke paas koi aisi kitaab jis mein clarity ho to mujhe bataayein us ka naam. kyunke dekhiye, jo sirat e mustaqeem hai, yeh jo Quran ka paigham hai, isi mein clarity hai, us ke bahar confusion hai.

wa ma ba'd al-haqq illadhalaal. haq ke ilawa jo hoga, us mein confusion hoga, contradiction hoga, inconsistency hogi. yahi hai sab mein. kyunke idhar is side pe log kuch kar nahi rahe hain. saare hamare ulama jo hain, one to all, without any exception, rawaiti baatein dohraate hain. koi mujhe ek bhi aalim nahi maloom jo aaj ke mind ko padhe, us ke lihaaz se us ko address kare. to kya hoga? yeh hoga woh forceful nahi hai, woh forceful nahi hai, woh sirf ek maidan khali hai, woh daud rahe hain.

woh yaani modern jo maidan paida hua hai, wahan wahan ulama hain hi nahi. ulama to masle masail bayan karte hain, fatwe dete hain. modern jo maidan hai, woh reason ka, modern reason, reason based Islam koi pesh hi nahi kar raha hai. fatwe dete hain, rawaiti baatein karte hain, kahaniyan sunate hain, fazail ki kahaniyan sunate hain. to baat yeh nahi ke forceful tareeqe se woh pesh kar rahe hain. woh ek un ko un ka maadi maidan khali hai. main to kitni saari kitaabein padhi hain logon ki, har kitaab mein confusion hai, kisi kitaab mein koi clarity nahi hoti.

kyunke wa ma ba'd al-haqq illadhalaal. to is liye yeh nahi samjhiye ke woh kuch kar rahe hain, yeh ke ek ulama nahi kar rahe, us ka masla hai. aur jo koi kare, to us ko appreciate bhi nahi karte. hamare ulama ka haal yeh hai, koi agar kare to appreciate bhi nahi karte us ko. na khud khard, na bakasrat jahad ka maamla un ka ho raha hai. to jo log ke jadeed yaani afkaar ke muballigh hain, woh khali maidan mein daud rahe hain, bas wahan par koi hai hi nahi un ko oppose karne wala, un ke saamne koi pesh karne wala baat ko. main main main bas bas samajhta hoon ke saari jo jo is mein jo responsibility hai, woh ulama ki hai, na khud kiya, na karne walon ko appreciate kiya unhone.

yeh mein bilkul soch samajh ke yeh baat kar raha hoon ke agar koi kare to us ko appreciate hi karte hain aur khud karte nahin. is par mein bohat si misalein de sakta hoon. agar koi janna chahe to inshallah. maulana abid rahmani sahib ne jammu kashmir se likha hai: "do so saal ke daur mein ummat ne dawat ko chhod diya. kya is daur mein dawat ka kaam poori tarah chhoota raha ya juzwi taur par?" dekhiye, mein jab jald bolta hoon, is ke maani kya hote hain?

ek hai deen ka apne aap, yaani deen apne aap jaari rahe aur is ka amal jaari rahe. yeh yeh to hamesha hi rahega. hum aap is ko khatm karein to khatm nahin kar sakte. deen ka tasalsul hum khatm nahin kar sakte. allah ta'ala ki taraf se woh chalta rehta hai. to poore is daur mein log islam qubool karte rahe, islam ka kaam hota raha apni apni taqat se. lekin jo jin ki responsibility thi, unhone yeh kaam nahin kiya. woh to wohi teen afai daryaft kiya, unhone teen saanpon ke peeche daudte rahe.

to mein yeh sirf is sense mein bolta hoon ke duty jin ki thi, unhone to kuch kaam anjaam nahin diya, lekin islam deen haq tha, quran aakhri mehfooz kitaab thi, is liye khud apne zor par woh amal karti rahi. is maani aap keh sakte hain ke juzwi taur par hua. yeh lafz bohat zyada sahi shayad na ho, lekin phir bhi aap bol sakte hain aise. maulana sharukh hussain ne dilli se likha hai: "ek sahib ne kaha ke hum apne mad'u ko poora quran dene ke bajaye sirf wohi ayat padh kar sunayein jis ki us ko zaroorat hai. jis tarah doctor apne mareez ko medicine book nahin deta, balkeh us ki bimari ke mutabiq particular medicine deta hai."

maulana sahib meharbani kar kar is ki wazahat farmayein. yeh misaal bilkul galat hai. aap medicine ki misaal ek se mein mind ka apply kar rahe hain is ko. nahin, poora quran dijiye. insaan khud select karta hai, khud wahan pahunchta hai. jab to woh ghore karta hai. woh medicine ki misaal yahan apply nahin hoti hai. albata quran ki soorat mein yeh kahoon ga ke daur jadeed ke lehaz se aap ko aur kitabein literature dena padega, jis ko mein kehta hoon ke madadgar literature. yaani quran bhi dijiye aur madadgar literature bhi dijiye. woh mein is ke qael nahin hoon ke ke kuch hissa padh sunayein, kuch hissa chhapayein.

ek para chhap ke dein, do para chhap ke dein. yeh sab is ko mein unnatural samajhta hoon. poora quran dijiye, lekin saath saath madadgar literature bhi aap ko dena padega taake aaj ke lehaz se us ke liye quran understandable ho jaye. yeh jaise mein ne aap ko misaal di, abhi do auraton ki gawahi wali baat. to quran mein jo ayatein padhe ga, to us ko is tashreeh chahiye. us ki tashreeh, us ki tashreeh ke liye aap aur koi literature dena padega.

in ayaton ko samajhne ke liye ek madadgar literature ya ek tashreehi literature chahiye. woh bhi aap dijiye saath saath, lekin poora quran dijiye. is mein ek baat yeh bhi dekhiye, aap nahin jaan sakte kaun si ayat us ko strike kare gi. mein bohat se qisse jaanta hoon aise ke ajeeb o ghareeb tor par kis cheez kis ayat ne us ko strike kiya. maslan woh yusuf alaihissalam wali baat bani gayi. mein ne kabhi socha bhi nahin tha yeh baat ke khuda mujh se khud khitab kar raha hai. eyha insaan! isi ko yahi us ko strike kar gaya. us ko yahi us ko strike kar gaya.

to ab hum ko peshgi taur par nahin pata hai kaun si us ko strike kare gi. is liye poora quran dijiye, lekin saath saath madadgar literature bhi zaroor dijiye. supportive jo mein kehta hoon, supportive literature. asrar ul hasan umri sahib ne tamil nadu se sawal kiya hai. unhon ne likha hai: "ulama aur arabic background wale logon ke liye al risala mission ki ahmiyat kya hai?